Cardon Copy Show

Designer Cardon Webb (pre­vi­ously writ­ten about here) recently had a really fun exhibit up at the Type Directors Club. Cardon Copy is an exper­i­ment in redesign­ing self-distributed fliers found around his neigh­bor­hood. Definitely a huge improve­ment if you ask me — maybe this will start a move­ment with other design­ers in their own neighborhoods.

Cardon Copy 01

Cardon Copy 02

Cardon Copy 03

Unfortunately the show closed yes­ter­day, but you can still see the indi­vid­ual pieces online right here.

4 Comments

  1. Posted May 21, 2009 at 2:25 am | Permalink

    Ok, these are crazy rad!

  2. liz
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    I looked at the site and some stuff is great. The idea is really cool but some of them are hard to read… they dont really do any­one any favours.

  3. jay dubbe
    Posted January 8, 2010 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    I under­stand the idea..good inten­tions. But two things. Sometimes cheap design works, because it con­veys “low ocst” as well. High design can be asso­ci­ated with high cost and there­fore this guy could have hurt these people’s chances of suc­cess. Also, in many case,s the typog­ra­phy is too hard to read. Function over form, dude, espe­ically when a sale is involved.

  4. Charlie
    Posted February 19, 2010 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    I have to say I whole heart­edly agree with jay dubbe. Other than the inse­cu­rity the orig­i­nal per­son post­ing must feel, it’s elit­ist to tell some­one that some­thing they’ve pub­lished — no mat­ter how hap­haz­ardly — is just not good.
    While I’m imme­di­ately drawn to the beau­ti­ful type — props, where props are due — I can’t help but feel that these some­what fail their orig­i­nally intended pur­pose. The apart­ment wanted ads par­tic­u­larly seem prob­lem­atic. For one, the bril­liance of the tear tab has been com­pletely elim­i­nated. The other issue I have with it is that it seems the intended audi­ence has now been alien­ated. By giv­ing these a makeover it almost seems like you’re sell­ing a com­mod­ity that is no longer acces­si­ble to those dis­en­fran­chised from the New York City hous­ing mar­ket. I’m not advo­cat­ing to cater to the low­est com­mon denom­i­na­tor, but by mak­ing these glossy, you’ve made it eas­ily dis­mis­sive to those who would nor­mally pay atten­tion to these ads. The fact that typos and gram­mat­i­cal errors were kept cre­ates a huge dis­con­nect for me per­son­ally. Now its an object that’s aware it’s beau­ti­ful, but okay with being slightly naïve if not dumb. All this being said, I am not com­fort­able call­ing this good design, but I do emphat­i­cally think this is mind-blowing art.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*